Thanks.
Have a great day!
Kat Morgan
--------------------
Kat my first question starts with an insight from my experience. Most decision making processes in our western world are deliberative. We bring people together to make a decision by discussion. We discuss all of the inputs, few participate and the discussion is dominated by the strongest personalities. What is missing? There is no dialogue preceding the discussion. It is not that discussion is wrong or bad, it services its purpose, but are the relationships solid going into the discussion? Are people truly willing to speak their mind? Have the most important questions be asked and talked about? Dialogue is generative and is by nature a conversational practice that open up possibilities, wisdom, new knowledge. Deliberation is designed to narrow down to a decision on one answer. I think of GIGO, an old computer term, garbage in, garbage out. You can have a fantastic deliberative session on garbage and have garbage out. The dialogue helps insure that you have quality in to deliberate.
So with all of that said, I would push towards a two phase process at least. And this can be iterative as well, not linear. Dialogue first and then harvest and then deliberation. Organizations almost always leave out the dialogue. And you happen to be talking to a whole community across the world that are experts on multiple dialogic processes. My two cents worth. Would love to hear other insights.
John Inman
---------------------
I'd add to what John has written by introducing the concept of
"decision happening" rather than "decision making". It is a term I coined a decade ago and am reminded of from time to time.
Decision happening uses collective discernment to discover the decision that is happening before our very eyes. It has a very different energy than "decision making." There is a curiosity. It has an openness and a sense of inquiry rather than a driving quickly towards a given decision. It invites the participation of spirit, non-material beings, the force of life -- however one gets at the memory that there is more involved here than just humans and our human systems.
In my work I refer to enspirited leadership as the kind of leadership that invites all of us forward -- intellect, emotions, spirit, hands. Decision happening relies on this sort of enspirited leadership.
I often use things like inviting people to create models with play-doh clay as one way to inquire into their lives and the decisions they are called to make. Also use nature walks, paired walks in silence where first one person, then another has their eyes closed and other guides them. I use Arawana Hayahsi's social presencing theatre work as other pathway in.
This is very rich and important territory. Good luck with your exploration and let me know how I might assist you.
Best,
Bob Stilger
-------------------
Ho Bob
what a clear way of seeing and describing this......thank you
I this mirror I realize that my mother Karen was a unassuming practitioner of hosting decision happenings
and in love with the timing, sense of trust, patience and simplicity that it takes to do this as a circle.
It may be time to give our very expensive and sophisticated intellects a rest and to simply practice how nature makes its decisions
of behalf of the whole........
Toke